HomeHome  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups  Log inLog in  

Share | 

 [Slavery] Ceedat vs Wiltshire - Guilty

Go down 

Number of posts : 164
Registration date : 2005-12-16

PostSubject: [Slavery] Ceedat vs Wiltshire - Guilty   Fri 4 May - 15:21

Bill of indictment wrote:
The defendant is charged with Slavery-001 Minimum wage in that Ceedat did hire Inara for 12 pounds, 3 pounds under the legal minimum.
The evidence: https://2img.net/h/i42.photobucket.com/albums/e321/nutmunkey/Criminal_Filth2.jpg
The prosecution call the victim and the witness to testify.

First defence pleading wrote:
The defendant didn't present to the Court.

Prosecutor indictment wrote:
The prosecution ask for proves for the repayment.
It is right that everyone deserves second chance.

Last defence pleading wrote:
The defendant didn't present to the Court.

Inara (called by the prosecutor) wrote:
I applied for a job without really thinking about it and didnt even notice the guy was offering under minimum wage. He has already said that he is willing to pay the difference and i am quite happy with that.

Mistakes happen every1 deserves a second chance.


MonkeyNut (called by the prosecutor) wrote:
Your honour, a level 2 player should know better. This is not the first time I have been summoned to the dock as a witness in recent times and with the current spate of slavery in our town I beg the judge to stamp on this behaviour before it gets out of control.

Statement wrote:
The defendant has been proved guilty of slavery.

As a level two, Ceedate should have known better. He is convicted and sentenced 10 pounds.
The defendant has been sentenced to 12 pounds fine.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
[Slavery] Ceedat vs Wiltshire - Guilty
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Archives of England :: Wiltshire County-
Jump to: